This comes after a rash of pro-Palestinian protests erupted on college campuses in the U.S. following last year’s attack by the terrorist group Hamas on Israel.
Republican members of three U.S. House of Representatives committees are pressing the University of California–San Francisco (UCSF) to provide more information related to reported allegations of anti-Semitism on its campus.
The House Energy and Commerce Committee’s chairwoman Cathy McMorris Rogers sent a letter July 31 to UCSF Chancellor Sam Hawgood citing hundreds of complaints of anti-Semitism or hostile work environments on campus by university employees and patients at the medical center received by the university’s office of prevention of harassment and discrimination.
In terms of the medical center, the committee noted some reports were from Jewish patients who they say have indicated they felt uncomfortable seeking treatment.
Some members of the House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations and the Subcommittee on Health joined Rogers asking for a response to the allegations.
“It is unacceptable for students, faculty, and others on campus to be subject to calls for violence in a learning environment and it is unacceptable for UCSF leadership to permit it,” the letter read.
The letter additionally sourced various media articles reporting incidents of alleged anti-Semitic behavior at the university, including several now-deleted social media posts with examples of faculty making allegedly anti-Israel statements.
The committee members stated in their letter that they had been told by those making complaints directly through the university that such actions and statements “fall under free speech protections.”
Recipients of federal health care funding through Medicaid and Medicare—such as providers at UCSF Health and its associated medical centers—are required to comply with civil rights laws, according to the committee.
“Any provider not compliant with federal civil rights laws is at risk for losing the right to participate in federal healthcare programs,” they wrote.
The committee noted that the university had received more than $850 million from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in 2023, including $790 million from the National Institutes of Health, which requires associated workplaces to be free from harassment and discrimination.
The letter asked how many complaints of anti-Semitism the university had received, what actions UCSF Health has taken to ensure a safe environment for students, faculty, staff, and patients, and what steps the university and its associated health center had taken to remain compliant with civil rights laws.
A request for comment from the UCSF Chancellor’s office and UCSF public affairs was not returned by publication time.
“As we all know, being an American means sometimes being asked to tolerate offensive and even hateful speech protected by our Constitution. But there are limits. At UCLA, we draw the line when speech crosses into intimidation, threats, and harassment of others,” he said.
Block emphasized the importance of finding a “balance” between freedom of speech and the mitigation of discrimination toward others based on their beliefs or identity.
“It is not always easy to strike a perfect balance, but it must always be our goal,” he said.