9.2 C
New York
November 21, 2024
News

Beijing’s Planners Find Strange (and Likely Ineffective) Ways to Get Buy-In From Private Investors

The Epoch Times

Beijing’s planning commission thinks the best way to motivate private investors is to insert itself into the process—very communist and not likely to succeed.

China’s beleaguered economy could use a dose of private investment—for expansion and for hiring—but private business remains reluctant. Beijing’s planners at the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) have put forward a 17-point scheme to turn this situation around. It relies so heavily on government direction that it is hard to see how much it will inspire private Chinese businesses and, consequently, how successful the effort will be. It is even hard to see whether the NDRC will push activity in economically appropriate directions.
Beijing knows how crucial private business is to China’s economy. Small and medium-sized firms—those that Beijing designates as having “56789” characteristics—account for over 90 percent of the businesses operating in China today. They produce 60 percent of the economy’s total goods and services and 70 percent of its innovative capacity. They employ 80 percent of those working in urban areas and create 90 percent of new jobs. They also contribute half of all government revenues.
Yet, as of the most recent data, private business still has not recovered from the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2023, according to the most recent period for which complete data are available, private business expanded at a mere 1.9 percent, compared to 4.4 percent for state-owned businesses. More telling, private business has actually cut back 0.2 percent on its investment spending. This reluctance and lack of dynamism is a major drag on China’s economy.

To deal with this matter, the NDRC has updated a 17-point plan to encourage private firms to accelerate their capital spending. Overwhelming as that much detail may sound, most of the points deal with how Beijing’s planners will interact with local governments to determine where private investment money should go. The NDRC plans to identify what it refers to as “key industries” that its planners believe will have “strong development potential.” After inviting input from provincial development and reform commissions, the NDRC will promote investment in these industries with private firms. The planners indicate that most of these opportunities will lie in transportation, water conservancy, clean energy, new infrastructure, advanced manufacturing, and modern agriculture.

According to the initial press briefing by the NDRC, the planners have identified some 2,900 investment projects suitable for private investment. Along with local planners, the NDRC will use what it calls “pre-acceptance inspections” to screen the potential investors. The planners calculate that the whole effort should absorb some 3.2 trillion yuan (about $470 billion).

To encourage participation, the NDRC will offer participating private businesses resource guarantees against shortfalls in supplies, credit information, and for infrastructure projects, they will streamline the development of real estate investment trusts (REITs). They will also lay the potential projects before relevant departments to shorten waiting times for approvals. For the acquisition of credit, the NDRC intends to present the projects to both state-owned and as joint-stock banks. These financial institutions will then conduct an independent review of the projects, according, the planners say, to “market principles,” though the documents remain vague on exactly what that means.

The plan strangely lacks any room for private firms to let planners know where they think the greatest opportunities lie and, by implication, where the greatest growth and profit opportunities lie. The plans do make provisions to listen to private concerns and promises regular surveys to get feedback from private companies. There is, however, no provision to solicit guidance from the private firms themselves. On the contrary, the plans suggest that private firms consult with local authorities for guidance on management and supervision.

As well thought out as all this may sound, the plans are fundamentally flawed. To deny the businesses involved any role in guidance is to immediately cut off the effort from the most intimate industry insight available. No matter how well the authorities pave the way for the projects that they prefer, they will have denied themselves the best guidance on whether those projects are the most promising. Any success then will depend almost entirely on a lucky coincidence between what the planners like and whether businesses think of those preferences are promising. And luck is a bad way for any economy to proceed.

Source link

Related posts

Ukraine Finally Deploying F-16 Fighter Jets, Says Zelenskyy

Reuters

What to Watch in the Wisconsin and Minnesota Primaries

Arjun Singh, Nathan Worcester

Star Katie Ledecky win her fourth Olympic gold in 800 freestyle

Kevin Baxter

Three Children Die from Suffocation In A Parked Vehicle

Wivanda

Closing Prices for Crude Oil, Gold, and Other Commodities (July 31)

The Associated Press

Gender-row fighter Lin Yu-Ting in women’s 57kg semi-final – updates

Thomas Jeffreys

Leave a Comment